Former Vice President and chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, has identified the absence of internal democracy within the nation’s registered political parties as the major reason why Nigeria’s democracy remains fragile.
He said it is equally the reason why the quality of leadership that the country produces has not matched the people’s expectations and the challenges facing the nation. Atiku who said this in his remarks as the chairman at the 2nd IPAC Annual Conference 2017 on Internal Party Democracy, with the theme:
A Recipe to a Sustainable Democracy in Nigeria, organised by the Inter-Party Advisory Council of Nigeria, at the Yar’Adua Centre, Abuja, noted that the people must have a genuine reform of the electoral system in order for them to freely choose those who will govern them.
The Turakin Adamawa stressed further that the absence of internal democracy within the parties is one of the reasons why it has been very difficult to hold leaders to account. While noting that power wielders hardly voluntarily enlarge the democratic space, Atiku said that is why he had often opined that internal party democracy will only come with genuine electoral reforms in the country.
“We must have a genuine reform of the electoral system in order to enable us to freely choose those who will govern us. Only genuine reform will be the incentive for political parties, especially the strong ones, to allow internal party democracy. Without it political godfathers will continue to impose candidates since the votes of the people will not be allowed to count and such leaders would not be accountable to the people.”
While noting that that has been his position over time, Atiku said that at a pre-inauguration retreat for All Progressives Congress’ senators-elect at Abuja on 23rd May, 2015 he had said, “That in order for the APC to succeed as a party in government and for our democracy to endure, the party, the Legislature and the Executive must work in concert.
They should not see one another as a competitor or rival. “That law-making for the overall good of our country requires that the Legislature has the autonomy to discharge its legislative and oversight functions. “For these to happen and be sustained, internal party democracy and electoral reforms are necessary to ensure that the people’s will always finds expression in governance,” he said.
According to him, “I made similar statements several other times, including in submissions to the National Assembly committees on Constitutional Amendment and the Justice Uwais Committee on Electoral Reform. “I recall these only to stress that the issue of internal democracy in our political parties has been with us for a long time, indeed since the restoration of civilian rule in 1999.
“Such reforms, broadly along the Justice Uwais Committee Recommendations, which will further strengthen the independence of INEC and ensure that votes count, will encourage parties to field popular candidates in elections. “And that in turn will encourage parties to allow internal democracy so members have the freedom to choose and express their opinions.
Thus the role of godfathers and executive intrusion in the affairs of parties and elections will be diminished”, he said. Continuing, Atiku said, “In my view, there is a close relationship between democracy within political parties and democracy within the nation. “Put simply you cannot give what you don’t have. You cannot build democracy on a substructure of dictatorship and intolerance. “A political party that constricts the freedom of its members cannot really offer freedom to the citizens of the nation. Democracy is not just an idea; is a cultural practice”, he maintained.
He said that because the nation’s democracy is young, just as the political parties, it was understandable that they will be battling with some teething problems unlike some matured democracies, but that he believes that with internal party democracy, most of the problems will be overcome.
“In long-established democracies, those statements would seem trite. But I recognise that our democracy is young, and our parties are also rather young. As a result they are still wrestling with issues of party building, party structures, internal democracy and the nature of the relationship between parties and members, parties and legislatures and parties and government as well as among parties themselves.
“We had a very long period of authoritarian rule in Nigeria, ending in 1999. The legacy of that period is still with us as can be seen in our various governance institutions. Indeed even elements of that authoritarian past still wield power and influence in our country as we try to transition from that legacy. “Also the structure of our economy is such that the state remains the most important source of economic opportunity.
This heightens the struggle for state power and helps to shape the relationship between parties and members, among parties and among the various arms of government.
“It is, therefore, a huge challenge to democratise governance and the political parties in our country. But, as the theme of this conference makes clear, internal democracy in our political parties is very important for the parties, their members and for the country. “
The absence of internal democracy in our parties is a major reason why our democracy remains fragile and why the quality of leadership that we produce has not matched our expectations and the challenges facing us as a nation. “It is also one of the reasons why it has been very difficult to hold leaders to account.
Internal party democracy is important enough that it was one of the areas addressed by the Electoral Reform Committee headed by Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais many years ago. “But we know that power wielders hardly voluntarily enlarge the democratic space. That is why I’ve often opined that internal party democracy will only come with genuine electoral reforms in the country.”
He said reforms along the Justice Uwais Committee Recommendations, “will encourage parties to allow internal democracy so members have the freedom to choose and express their opinions. Thus the role of godfathers and executive intrusion in the affairs of parties and elections will be diminished. “In my view, there is a close relationship between democracy within political parties and democracy within the nation.
Put simply you cannot give what you don’t have. You cannot build democracy on a substructure of dictatorship and intolerance. A political party that constricts the freedom of its members cannot really offer freedom to the citizens of the nation. Democracy is not just an idea; is a cultural practice.
“For a number of years now, we have had political parties, even governing ones, which hardly hold meetings of their important organs, including those meant for the democratic selection of their leadership, or even constitute institutions prescribed in their Constitution. “In the absence of those meetings and elections, their existing leadership, often under the direction of the Executive at the state or federal level, fills the void.
That’s not party building but party bullying. And it’s certainly not a way to democratise parties and aggregate their members’ opinions, interests and aspirations. “This means that efforts to deepen Nigeria’s democracy must include efforts at democratising our political parties.
The institutionalisation of democracy in our internal party processes will help us deepen democracy in Nigeria. Leaders are more likely to tolerate opposition from citizens and other parties if they tolerate it within their own party,” he said. Atiku further notes that the lack of internal democracy in political parties is one of the reasons for the fraught relationships among parties and their elected representatives and the legislature and the executive.
According to him the loyalty of some in the legislature and executive lies not with the party, but with a godfather who sponsored them, and the godfather may even be in a rival political party. “Such anomalies will reduce if internal democracy flourishes in our political parties, and by extension the wider society. “The selection of leaders in a democracy is a serious business because so many other things ride on it.
Whenever we get it wrong the nation or a part thereof suffers. We must strive to get it right most of the time. And it is the voters who should freely make that determination,” he opined.
